A social community of enthusiasts, owners, appreciators and collectors. With expert knowledge of all things from MG to Rover and beyond.
Poppy1 wrote:Hiya. I have not had an easy time of late. Certainly not looking for sympathy or mollycoddling. I hear what you say, but if I censor myself to just using a forum for information, then I cannot get into any more conflict. Anyway, my knowledge of mechanics and cars will not be a great loss. lol.
Poppy1 wrote:Hiya Mick. No one know's on here if I indeed have a sense of humour or not.... I have not had the chance to get that far I afraid... lol. Poppy
Tourerfogey wrote:Going back to Poppy's original question - you have to slag off 'another' forum over here because you can't get away with it over there . . .
Zeb wrote:Tourerfogey wrote:Going back to Poppy's original question - you have to slag off 'another' forum over here because you can't get away with it over there . . .
Can you not?? I wish someone had told me this some time back..
Chartermark wrote:
Inevitably the conclusion to consideration is a personal choice. Many of us migrated to this place, where censorship is rendered unnecessary by self restraint and the debate on difference is left elsewhere.
stevemac wrote:Chartermark wrote:
Inevitably the conclusion to consideration is a personal choice. Many of us migrated to this place, where censorship is rendered unnecessary by self restraint and the debate on difference is left elsewhere.
Unfortunately the criteria for self restraint is by definition down to oneself. The larger the pool of people, the wider the definition of restraint. This forum has less censorship because there are far fewer users. Believe me, give it time.
Mick wrote:stevemac wrote:Chartermark wrote:
Inevitably the conclusion to consideration is a personal choice. Many of us migrated to this place, where censorship is rendered unnecessary by self restraint and the debate on difference is left elsewhere.
Unfortunately the criteria for self restraint is by definition down to oneself. The larger the pool of people, the wider the definition of restraint. This forum has less censorship because there are far fewer users. Believe me, give it time.
You may find yourself pleasantly surprised Steve. It's the regular users that make a site what it is, perhaps this forums regular users will be drawn from a pool that enjoys it the way it is, others, especially attention seekers will be ignored, or stroked nicely until they fall asleep.
stevemac wrote:Chartermark wrote:
Inevitably the conclusion to consideration is a personal choice. Many of us migrated to this place, where censorship is rendered unnecessary by self restraint and the debate on difference is left elsewhere.
Unfortunately the criteria for self restraint is by definition down to oneself. The larger the pool of people, the wider the definition of restraint. This forum has less censorship because there are far fewer users. Believe me, give it time.
Jumper wrote: If the 'larger' pool continually ignores the ignorant and loud-mouthed, then moderation (literal meaning) will triumph without the need for intervention. The troublemakers thrive on the angry response, the moderate recognises that and starves its originators of oxygen. I think. If no one else minds.
stevemac wrote:Jumper wrote: If the 'larger' pool continually ignores the ignorant and loud-mouthed, then moderation (literal meaning) will triumph without the need for intervention. The troublemakers thrive on the angry response, the moderate recognises that and starves its originators of oxygen. I think. If no one else minds.
True, in an ideal world. BTW If you ever find an ideal world, let me know, I would like to move there!