-
Mick
(Site Admin)
A social community of enthusiasts, owners, appreciators and collectors. With expert knowledge of all things from MG to Rover and beyond.
Mick wrote:For example, nobody has noticed that the page loading times are up to 43% faster than previous iterations.
Jürgen wrote:Mick wrote:For example, nobody has noticed that the page loading times are up to 43% faster than previous iterations.
Sorry, I can't confirm that. Looks like an exaggeration in marketing speech.
You should know the facts, it's up to 42% faster now.
Dave wrote:Jürgen wrote:Mick wrote:For example, nobody has noticed that the page loading times are up to 43% faster than previous iterations.
Sorry, I can't confirm that. Looks like an exaggeration in marketing speech.
You should know the facts, it's up to 42% faster now.
I made it 42.31% actually Jürgen!
Jürgen wrote:Dave wrote:Jürgen wrote:Mick wrote:For example, nobody has noticed that the page loading times are up to 43% faster than previous iterations.
Sorry, I can't confirm that. Looks like an exaggeration in marketing speech.
You should know the facts, it's up to 42% faster now.
I made it 42.31% actually Jürgen!
Dave, may I ask you to publish your scientific data please ...
Mick wrote:Do I detect a modicum of urine extraction in this topic?
Dave wrote:Jürgen wrote:Dave wrote:Jürgen wrote:Mick wrote:For example, nobody has noticed that the page loading times are up to 43% faster than previous iterations.
Sorry, I can't confirm that. Looks like an exaggeration in marketing speech.
You should know the facts, it's up to 42% faster now.
I made it 42.31% actually Jürgen!
Dave, may I ask you to publish your scientific data please ...
I've got a spreadsheet with it on somewhere.....