Still having sciatica problems, I'm reduced to watching daytime television at times owing to enforced idleness. However, I'm at a loss to work out what constitutes news on TV.
OK, my own view, and not one shared by all, but the mind-numbingly boring junk available on the usual channels makes me head straight for the so-called "News" channels, ie. BBC News and Sky News. Only to find that both channels are broadcasting the tearful protestations of that odiously arrogant second rate actor.
How can this be news? I thought news channels were meant to be dynamic and thought provoking and keeping up to date with world and local affairs, not South African soap opera?
Is this some spat between the BBC and Sky whereby viewers are not sufficiently important to be given a choice?
OK Paul. Take a deep breath
OK, my own view, and not one shared by all, but the mind-numbingly boring junk available on the usual channels makes me head straight for the so-called "News" channels, ie. BBC News and Sky News. Only to find that both channels are broadcasting the tearful protestations of that odiously arrogant second rate actor.
How can this be news? I thought news channels were meant to be dynamic and thought provoking and keeping up to date with world and local affairs, not South African soap opera?
Is this some spat between the BBC and Sky whereby viewers are not sufficiently important to be given a choice?
OK Paul. Take a deep breath