Increased fuel consumption by Raistlin


User avatar
Raistlin
VeeKay is proving to be a tad thirsty at the moment :(

No other indications beyond increased consumption that I am able to perceive. Russ had her on T4 (Testbook version 4.Computer Diagnostic System) a few weeks ago prior to the 160 re-map and the engine was sound as a pound.

Doesn't seem related to the re-map as it has only been the last week or so that I've noticed the change in consumption.

I suspect there are a plethora of things to check so would anybody who knows be kind enough to list them for me please?
Paul

Cogito ergo sum... maybe?

Click the image to go to Nano-Meet Website
Image

Posted 25 Apr 2013, 14:56 #1 

User avatar
Raistlin
That'll be a NO then?
Paul

Cogito ergo sum... maybe?

Click the image to go to Nano-Meet Website
Image

Posted 26 Apr 2013, 13:31 #2 

User avatar
JohnDotCom
MAF (Mass Air Flow Sensor) Sensor (out of spec or snide Bosch one?)
Wrong setting on Synergy Unit (if fitted)try turning down slightly
Dirty Fuel Filter
Fuel leak from damaged or corroded fuel lines
Blocked Dirty Air Filter
PCV (Positive Crankcase Ventilation Valve) Unit
Leaking hoses (More difficult to find but only needs small hole)
Dragging brakes
Handbrake not releasing properly

........and a heavy foot or cold start mornings in a Autobox car

Just a quick few from memory, will find full list later Paul.
John

"My lovely car now sold onto a very happy new owner.
I still love this marque and I will still be around, preferred selling to breaking, as a great runner and performer"

Posted 26 Apr 2013, 15:17 #3 


Suffolk Man
i went thro this two weeks ago.mins has every thing checked but in the end down to the fbh running most of the time which was due to faulty sensor.but as it was new and the freelander one with a wider operating range i did not suspect it.this in part was because i did not.and for that matter still dont no what the range of this one is a opposed to the standard rover one.

Posted 26 Apr 2013, 21:54 #4 

User avatar
Raistlin
Thanks John :) I've now worked through he list and can find nothing wrong. I can't confirm leaking pipes though, other than a visual check.
Paul

Cogito ergo sum... maybe?

Click the image to go to Nano-Meet Website
Image

Posted 27 Apr 2013, 09:33 #5 

User avatar
Raistlin
Another brim-to-brim and fuel consumption works out at 28.8 mpg :(
Paul

Cogito ergo sum... maybe?

Click the image to go to Nano-Meet Website
Image

Posted 02 May 2013, 19:37 #6 

User avatar
Mick
(Site Admin)
Blimey that's worse than my V6 auto. Better get the crew to give it a going over at the Noonah meet next week.

Posted 02 May 2013, 21:01 #7 

User avatar
Bermudan 75
Did you get this sorted out Paul?

Cheers

Mike
Image

Posted 10 Jun 2013, 10:41 #8 

User avatar
Raistlin
It went of its own accord Mike. Very odd.
Paul

Cogito ergo sum... maybe?

Click the image to go to Nano-Meet Website
Image

Posted 10 Jun 2013, 12:01 #9 

User avatar
Arctic
(Trader)
Paul.
If it went on its own something must be sticking maybe EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation Valve) staying closed when it should not thats if you have not done the bypass or did it change when you replaced the air induct ? did you recently change the PCV filter etc best to try and find out otherwise it may come back with a vengence :roll: ad you may end up having to get a V8 ;) no best to have a good look at things in July meet wont hurt Arctic
Pearl Firefrost
ARCTIC

Posted 10 Jun 2013, 22:10 #10 

User avatar
Raistlin
OK Steve :) At the July meet then - assuming nothing gets in my way. FYI, the EGR is bypassed and I haven't changed anything else recently.
Paul

Cogito ergo sum... maybe?

Click the image to go to Nano-Meet Website
Image

Posted 11 Jun 2013, 08:35 #11 


Top